ahernink.gif

Writing your case for support
Crafting direct mail and other donor correspondence
Developing popular donor newsletters
Down-to-earth training in best practices
Auditing donor communications programs for effectiveness
|  SUBSCRIBE |   NEWSLETTER |   CALENDAR |   CONTACT |   HOME |  
Newsletters
2013
13.01: Composing a satisfying thanks: Wikipedia did
One way to build trust is by answering questions before they're asked.
13.02 Know thy customer ... Who's buying you?
Customer satisfaction. Customer knowledge. Serious marketers obsess over them. But not fundraisers.
13.03 Want to deepen your "culture of philanthropy"? That requires adding so-called "social information" to your messaging stew.
Social Information = Donor Growth Hormone
13.04 Bequests: The other white meat?
"Planned giving" might well be a major marketing misstep....
13.05 What things make me generous? Confessions of a donor.
Speaking from the heart.... Why I give
13.06 Confessions of a donor ... part 2!
"Donors spotted near deep-ocean hydrothermal vent..." What do we really know about them?
13.07 The charity newsletter: Friend or foe?
Getting past your unprofitable fears
2012
12.01: Following in the footsteps of your promise
They chose your charity for a reason, when they gave that first time. Your donor newsletter should reflect, not neglect, that reason.
12.02: Charity newsletters
Extraordinary experiences ... for the rest of us.
12.03: The brain according to me
Neuroscience is the most important force at work in fundraising today. Or it should be.
12.04: Cheryl and Kathy ask good grassroots questions
About donor newsletters & more
12.05: Why we put a lot of charity in our will
The secret life of donors
12.06: Are thanks really necessary?
Some experts say, "No."
12.07: Readers of this newsletter rise in defense of thanking the heck out of donors. Trinkets get the boot.
No thanks? "No, thanks!"
12.08: "Dear Thomas..." or "Dear Tom..."
How would you like to be addressed? Does your favorite charity's database know the difference? Probably not.
12.09: What role do e-newsletters play in fundraising?
They're lousy at bringing in donations, a veteran copywriter observes.
12.10: Now entering the fundraising arena: the next big generation of donors. In the US, they will be ages 55-75.
Rise of the baby boomers -- again?
12.11: So, there!
Email newsletters don't get results? Some highly indignant email fans beg to powerfully differ.
12.12: The person signing your appeal might wonder...
Why does good direct mail sound so weird?
12.13: It's the wrong answer to a great question. So let's do something else.
Elevator speech? Ride to nowhere.
12.14: Tell little stories all over the place. The human mind laps that stuff up.
Notes from neuroscience
12.15: "Non-profit?"
Donors have no idea what you do with their money. And frankly? They suspect the worst!!!
12.16: Meet Jane
Your "One size fits all ages" appeals ignore a juicy fact: a 70-something is way different than a 50-something.
12.17: Look, your newsletter is in fact a "customer service experience"
And the content donors like to read? It's what charities so rarely say.
12.18: The Warren Buffett lesson
A printed annual report is a different experience than an online annual report, for a couple of reasons.
2011
11.01: The nuts and guts of a successful bequest-sales strategy
Proper bequest marketing, per Radcliffe, part 2
11.02: A troubled mind walks into a bar
A few things I want to get off my fat-flated chest, as 2011 ignites.
11.03: The 5 Realizations Approach
Finding the Path to Donor Nirvana
11.04: Most donor communications do not achieve anything like the desired results, thanks to an error as common as salt in sea water
The Hidden Killer - A Simple Misunderstanding
11.05: B4 u do yr annual report
Repeat after me: "I am a marketer!" And consider a few donor-friendly models, for inspiration.
11.06: "Dear donors: We're happy to say, we have switched to a digital annual report."
Happy? R U really so sure?
11.07: How a $1,000 gift was born
Does your staff know what to say to strangers, should the occasion arise?
11.08: Which is your next priority, younger donors or boomers?
An infatuation with younger donors can distract you from the real work at hand: cultivating boomers as they start their bell lap.
11.09: Is that your future calling?
Lately, my crystal ball is waking me up ... with unnerving predictions
11.10: Playing to lose
What happens when know-nothings are allowed to outvote the fundraiser? A sure-fire recipe for failure.
11.11: Social Information: A gentle nudge in the right direction
Dr. Sargeant finds that the mere mention of what another donor gave leads to copycats & increased giving
11.12: You're selling forest. You're not selling trees.
Donors give to the mission. If you're getting great results, feel free to spend their gifts as you see fit. (Though Charity Navigator might disagree.)
11.13: Meet AIDA: the sales formula, not the opera
This oldie but goody makes writing a direct mail letter faster and far easier.
11.14: The Verbatim Rule
You know, it just makes sense.
11.15: In direct mail, all responses, even complaints, are good
Hoping you'll offend no one? That's the wrong star to wish on.
11.16: The "planned giving" newsletter: Does anyone really need these things?
Pity the trees that died in the pursuit of lackluster results.
11.17: The Domain Formula for donor newsletters
Certified Proven (unlike the others)
2010
10.01: Idiot's guide to time management
I fidget, you fidget, we all fidget.
10.02: Donor profiles in your newsletters: Worth the trouble?
They can lead to bigger things ... or nowhere. You decide.
10.03: Young heads are different heads
Are younger donors alive ... or dead to you?
10.04: Is direct mail dead? (No, it's just dull.)
My goal? Entertain the heck out of the reader.
10.05: "I'll never give you a penny again!" Music to my ears.
Here's a terrific direct mail concept the client refused to try. Take it if you want ... and if you dare.
10.06: Your strategic plan = your case for support?
No! Don't! "The bridge is out"!!!
10.07: Oh, man, did Dale Carnegie have it right.
How to win friends and influence people: Donor bequest edition...
10.08: Why gifts matter
They buy impact and self-esteem
10.09: Why, oh why, don't they trust you?
"Because I don't pee like Jesus."
10.10: How to produce powerful case statements
Approvals, the delicate art of
10.11: Connecting gift and impact
The 2 dots that matter
10.12: The outrageous Mr. Radcliffe wishes a word
Bequest marketing the right way
2009
9.01: Does your boss or board chair get to approve your stuff? Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.
Sad but true: Most donor communications are built to fail
9.02: If your paper newsletter is a flop, switching to electronic won't help.
Two key questions answered about newsletters
9.03: I just wrote a couple of appeals for a big hospital. This time I took notes. Here's how to get a better letter.
Your next direct mail appeal: Will it burst into song?
9.04: "Deserving charity"? There's no such thing.
No one owes you a gift, as this "inside a donor's mind" report makes clear.
9.05: Take the Donor-Centered Pledge (or die)
23 rules to live by (instead)
9.06: Straight to trash? The avoidable, sad fate of most annual reports
Entertain me with stories. Put stats in perspective.
9.07: Writing a fabulous case is easy
You're just answering questions
9.08: Bill's amazing "Warm Words" campaign
Bill Pratt decided to raise something other than money for once, and joyous response flooded in
9.09: A campaign case is a series of talking points
Report from the front lines
9.10: The perfect "eventless" fundraising event
Arts charity raises money year round: Pick a day, any day. And fund it.
9.11: Are you a funds-raiser or a funds-depleter?
Basing your metrics on acquisition is like trying to bail a boat with a sieve. You work hard, but you still sink.
9.12: Dr. Sargeant says you're only doing half your job
And he has the data to prove it.
9.13: Release your inner archer: Learn to shoot message arrows
Targets? The vulnerable hearts and curious minds of your donors
9.14: Valuable direct mail concept absolutely free
Do you have the guts to try something different? My client didn't.
9.15: Deciding what goes into your donor newsletter
Here's the easiest explanation I've ever come up with
9.16: Qualityspotting
How do you know when your donor materials are strong enough for the outside world?
2008
8.01: Acquiring new donors through direct mail: Measuring success
Measuring donor acquisition programs
8.02: Why is giving by bequest so rare in the U.S.?
Reviving your "death brochure"
8.03: Would you buy a mattress from this charity?
What you do vs. why you matter
8.04: How to write a good donor-centric headline
Writing a winning headline
8.05: Does your stuff suffer from jargon breath?
Adopt a zero-jargon policy and you'll raise more money
8.07: What is news?
Making donor news the right way
8.08: Obama's Web 3.0 campaign: Rewarding role model? Or risky distraction?
Are e-newsletters dead?
8.09: Richard Radcliffe has your back
Are you marketing bequests? (Right.) Or "planned gifts"? (Wrongo.)
8.10: When you're feeling a little irrelevant...
Do you know the real you? The one donors really care about? Likely not, thanks to the "curse of knowledge." But there's an easy way (fun, too) to see yourself anew. Read on.
8.11: The dirty truth about cases
Bitter truth? Maybe a quarter of the cases I'm hired to write never reach the finish line. Interesting tale, that.
8.12: Why won't paper die?
Everyone's drumming their fingers, waiting for paper to expire as a communications medium. Sorry.
8.13: Can direct mail be a cash cow for smaller nonprofits? Think "cash calves" instead.
Mass-market expectations yield disappointing results at local levels. Take heart, though: direct mail is about far more than instant cash.
8.14: "Hi. My name's Inertia. And I'll be disappointing you from this day forward. I know you have many obstacles to surmount, so I'm thrilled that you've named me Number One."
Meet the enemy: Inertia
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
3.01: Analytical types: Good to the last objection
Part one of four personality types...
3.02: Amiables: Smile and say "Howdy!"
Part two of four personality types...
3.03: Expressives crave the new
Part three of four personality types...
3.04: Bottom-Liners leap to conclusions (and that's a good thing)
Part four of four personality types...
3.05: Are you interesting (especially to donors)?
Communications basics...
3.06: The Abraham Lincoln lesson
Case basics...
3.07: A surefire story formula
Case basics...
12.16: Meet Jane
Your "One size fits all ages" appeals ignore a juicy fact: a 70-something is way different than a 50-something.

I'm lucky. And it's a huge advantage.

I actually know the exact average age of the donor I'm writing to persuade, when I write direct mail appeals for a major hospital system in southern California.

I can picture precisely whom I'm writing to.

OK ... I hope you'll indulge me now ... and take a little quiz.

I want you to guess the average donor's age at this particular hospital system. The answer's at the bottom of this column. Don't peek.

Piece of luck #2: I also know the exact average age of the prospects this hospital mails to by the tens of thousands, hoping to acquire new donors.

Same deal. Average age of actual donors. Average age of actual prospects. I want you to guess. Don't peek.

Got your two guesses in mind? OK, now you can peek.

U.S. donors are OLD

Meet a real-life average donor. Her name is Jane.

When I write my direct mail appeals, I write to Jane more or less. After all, you really can't just write to some nebulous "great unknown." Trust me: you'll stall. You have to assume there's a particular audience out there who will be especially receptive to your message.

That audience isn't everyone. It's a specific few. Like Jane.

As the late, truly great George Smith said in his book, Tiny Essentials of Writing for Fundraising, "All fundraising copy should sound like someone talking." George Smith advised having a clear, mental picture of the person you're addressing, as you start writing. I have found his advice to be durably sound.

Jane in particular

I know Jane unusually well because she's my mother-in-law. Put aside "mother in law" stereotypes. I admire and respect Jane. And to the depths of the earth I will always adore her because she gave the world Simone.

Jane turned 87 in 2011.

She reads the New York Times daily and consumes crossword puzzles like salted peanuts. She fusses on about, "I can't remember anything anymore."

Jane is by nature charitably inclined. Raised on Midwestern milk and values: you help when you can.

She is "direct-mail responsive." Jane gives to a half-dozen local charities and the occasional national advocacy group. She gives to Smile Train because they asked ... and because she had six kids born without physical deformities. "I'm thankful."

Jane has put money in her will, for her university.

What does the university mean to her? She still eats at the Faculty Club. (Universities: Are you distributing fundraising materials with the menus?) She met her husband there as an undergraduate. She worked and volunteered there for decades. Her husband taught there for decades, retiring as the department head. All her six children graduated from there and subsequently did just fine.

TV is a big part of Jane's life, now that it's hard for her to get around. She gives to her local PBS TV affiliate.

Writing to the Janes of this world

What does a 75-year-old (or a 87-year-old) want -- or need -- to hear?

Well, probably not what a 45-year-old or a 60-year-old needs to hear ... not entirely, anyway.

Look ... if the secret to ever-increasing success in sales is the ever-more-refined segmentation of your target audience (and it is) ... then writing in a different way specifically for a 75-year-old ear, eye, and brain just makes eminent sense.

Yet we don't.

We ignore age in our appeals, by and large.

I professionally assess maybe 100 direct mail appeals every year from various charities. Based on this sample, I can say that the only charity I've yet encountered that maybe writes age-specific appeals is AARP (formerly the American Association of Retired Persons).

Age does matter

When I was 20, I didn't think so.

When I was 30, I didn't think so.

When I was 40, I didn't think so.

When I was 50, I started to think so.

When I was 60, I knew the truth: aging and the "final lap" isn't all fun and games.

To all you 20-somethings who've just entered the fundraising profession....

To all you 30-somethings who are rising fundraising stars....

To all you 40-somethings who are solid-as-rock fundraisers....

To all you 50-somethings who are standing near the peak of your career....

... you have not yet (long may you live, I hasten to add) personally experienced the bubbling mires of a 70-something heart and mind.

Unless you're an adult caregiver. Then maybe you know.

As you age, you experience mounting losses: of physical strength, health, peers, authority, identity, and financial independence. So says author, David Solie.

Sophie Penney introduced me to this book. In How to Say It to Seniors, David Solie insists that 70-somethings are urgently interested in just two things:

(1) exerting as much control over their loss-battered personal environment as possible ... and

(2) "discovering their legacy." People in their 70s chew on a very tough question all the time: "What has my life meant?"

Thought for today: Do young fundraisers need more training to talk profitably to average (i.e., older) donors?

2nd thought for today: Isn't the "quest for younger donors" just, for many fundraisers, an attempt to deny the facts on the ground - that the old like to give, and the young have other ways to spend their surplus cash?

-----

Answers: The average age of a donor to the hospital is 75, while the average age of a person receiving the solicitation is 65.
 
Copyright © 2005-2013, by Tom Ahern and Ahern Donor Communications, Ink.
All rights reserved., 10 Johnson Road, Foster, RI 02825, Phone: 401-397-8104, Email: a2bmail@aol.com.