ahernink.gif

Writing your case for support
Crafting direct mail and other donor correspondence
Developing popular donor newsletters
Down-to-earth training in best practices
Auditing donor communications programs for effectiveness
|  SUBSCRIBE |   NEWSLETTER |   CALENDAR |   CONTACT |   HOME |  
Newsletters
2013
13.01: Composing a satisfying thanks: Wikipedia did
One way to build trust is by answering questions before they're asked.
13.02 Know thy customer ... Who's buying you?
Customer satisfaction. Customer knowledge. Serious marketers obsess over them. But not fundraisers.
13.03 Want to deepen your "culture of philanthropy"? That requires adding so-called "social information" to your messaging stew.
Social Information = Donor Growth Hormone
13.04 Bequests: The other white meat?
"Planned giving" might well be a major marketing misstep....
13.05 What things make me generous? Confessions of a donor.
Speaking from the heart.... Why I give
13.06 Confessions of a donor ... part 2!
"Donors spotted near deep-ocean hydrothermal vent..." What do we really know about them?
13.07 The charity newsletter: Friend or foe?
Getting past your unprofitable fears
2012
12.01: Following in the footsteps of your promise
They chose your charity for a reason, when they gave that first time. Your donor newsletter should reflect, not neglect, that reason.
12.02: Charity newsletters
Extraordinary experiences ... for the rest of us.
12.03: The brain according to me
Neuroscience is the most important force at work in fundraising today. Or it should be.
12.04: Cheryl and Kathy ask good grassroots questions
About donor newsletters & more
12.05: Why we put a lot of charity in our will
The secret life of donors
12.06: Are thanks really necessary?
Some experts say, "No."
12.07: Readers of this newsletter rise in defense of thanking the heck out of donors. Trinkets get the boot.
No thanks? "No, thanks!"
12.08: "Dear Thomas..." or "Dear Tom..."
How would you like to be addressed? Does your favorite charity's database know the difference? Probably not.
12.09: What role do e-newsletters play in fundraising?
They're lousy at bringing in donations, a veteran copywriter observes.
12.10: Now entering the fundraising arena: the next big generation of donors. In the US, they will be ages 55-75.
Rise of the baby boomers -- again?
12.11: So, there!
Email newsletters don't get results? Some highly indignant email fans beg to powerfully differ.
12.12: The person signing your appeal might wonder...
Why does good direct mail sound so weird?
12.13: It's the wrong answer to a great question. So let's do something else.
Elevator speech? Ride to nowhere.
12.14: Tell little stories all over the place. The human mind laps that stuff up.
Notes from neuroscience
12.15: "Non-profit?"
Donors have no idea what you do with their money. And frankly? They suspect the worst!!!
12.16: Meet Jane
Your "One size fits all ages" appeals ignore a juicy fact: a 70-something is way different than a 50-something.
12.17: Look, your newsletter is in fact a "customer service experience"
And the content donors like to read? It's what charities so rarely say.
12.18: The Warren Buffett lesson
A printed annual report is a different experience than an online annual report, for a couple of reasons.
2011
11.01: The nuts and guts of a successful bequest-sales strategy
Proper bequest marketing, per Radcliffe, part 2
11.02: A troubled mind walks into a bar
A few things I want to get off my fat-flated chest, as 2011 ignites.
11.03: The 5 Realizations Approach
Finding the Path to Donor Nirvana
11.04: Most donor communications do not achieve anything like the desired results, thanks to an error as common as salt in sea water
The Hidden Killer - A Simple Misunderstanding
11.05: B4 u do yr annual report
Repeat after me: "I am a marketer!" And consider a few donor-friendly models, for inspiration.
11.06: "Dear donors: We're happy to say, we have switched to a digital annual report."
Happy? R U really so sure?
11.07: How a $1,000 gift was born
Does your staff know what to say to strangers, should the occasion arise?
11.08: Which is your next priority, younger donors or boomers?
An infatuation with younger donors can distract you from the real work at hand: cultivating boomers as they start their bell lap.
11.09: Is that your future calling?
Lately, my crystal ball is waking me up ... with unnerving predictions
11.10: Playing to lose
What happens when know-nothings are allowed to outvote the fundraiser? A sure-fire recipe for failure.
11.11: Social Information: A gentle nudge in the right direction
Dr. Sargeant finds that the mere mention of what another donor gave leads to copycats & increased giving
11.12: You're selling forest. You're not selling trees.
Donors give to the mission. If you're getting great results, feel free to spend their gifts as you see fit. (Though Charity Navigator might disagree.)
11.13: Meet AIDA: the sales formula, not the opera
This oldie but goody makes writing a direct mail letter faster and far easier.
11.14: The Verbatim Rule
You know, it just makes sense.
11.15: In direct mail, all responses, even complaints, are good
Hoping you'll offend no one? That's the wrong star to wish on.
11.16: The "planned giving" newsletter: Does anyone really need these things?
Pity the trees that died in the pursuit of lackluster results.
11.17: The Domain Formula for donor newsletters
Certified Proven (unlike the others)
2010
10.01: Idiot's guide to time management
I fidget, you fidget, we all fidget.
10.02: Donor profiles in your newsletters: Worth the trouble?
They can lead to bigger things ... or nowhere. You decide.
10.03: Young heads are different heads
Are younger donors alive ... or dead to you?
10.04: Is direct mail dead? (No, it's just dull.)
My goal? Entertain the heck out of the reader.
10.05: "I'll never give you a penny again!" Music to my ears.
Here's a terrific direct mail concept the client refused to try. Take it if you want ... and if you dare.
10.06: Your strategic plan = your case for support?
No! Don't! "The bridge is out"!!!
10.07: Oh, man, did Dale Carnegie have it right.
How to win friends and influence people: Donor bequest edition...
10.08: Why gifts matter
They buy impact and self-esteem
10.09: Why, oh why, don't they trust you?
"Because I don't pee like Jesus."
10.10: How to produce powerful case statements
Approvals, the delicate art of
10.11: Connecting gift and impact
The 2 dots that matter
10.12: The outrageous Mr. Radcliffe wishes a word
Bequest marketing the right way
2009
9.01: Does your boss or board chair get to approve your stuff? Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.
Sad but true: Most donor communications are built to fail
9.02: If your paper newsletter is a flop, switching to electronic won't help.
Two key questions answered about newsletters
9.03: I just wrote a couple of appeals for a big hospital. This time I took notes. Here's how to get a better letter.
Your next direct mail appeal: Will it burst into song?
9.04: "Deserving charity"? There's no such thing.
No one owes you a gift, as this "inside a donor's mind" report makes clear.
9.05: Take the Donor-Centered Pledge (or die)
23 rules to live by (instead)
9.06: Straight to trash? The avoidable, sad fate of most annual reports
Entertain me with stories. Put stats in perspective.
9.07: Writing a fabulous case is easy
You're just answering questions
9.08: Bill's amazing "Warm Words" campaign
Bill Pratt decided to raise something other than money for once, and joyous response flooded in
9.09: A campaign case is a series of talking points
Report from the front lines
9.10: The perfect "eventless" fundraising event
Arts charity raises money year round: Pick a day, any day. And fund it.
9.11: Are you a funds-raiser or a funds-depleter?
Basing your metrics on acquisition is like trying to bail a boat with a sieve. You work hard, but you still sink.
9.12: Dr. Sargeant says you're only doing half your job
And he has the data to prove it.
9.13: Release your inner archer: Learn to shoot message arrows
Targets? The vulnerable hearts and curious minds of your donors
9.14: Valuable direct mail concept absolutely free
Do you have the guts to try something different? My client didn't.
9.15: Deciding what goes into your donor newsletter
Here's the easiest explanation I've ever come up with
9.16: Qualityspotting
How do you know when your donor materials are strong enough for the outside world?
2008
8.01: Acquiring new donors through direct mail: Measuring success
Measuring donor acquisition programs
8.02: Why is giving by bequest so rare in the U.S.?
Reviving your "death brochure"
8.03: Would you buy a mattress from this charity?
What you do vs. why you matter
8.04: How to write a good donor-centric headline
Writing a winning headline
8.05: Does your stuff suffer from jargon breath?
Adopt a zero-jargon policy and you'll raise more money
8.07: What is news?
Making donor news the right way
8.08: Obama's Web 3.0 campaign: Rewarding role model? Or risky distraction?
Are e-newsletters dead?
8.09: Richard Radcliffe has your back
Are you marketing bequests? (Right.) Or "planned gifts"? (Wrongo.)
8.10: When you're feeling a little irrelevant...
Do you know the real you? The one donors really care about? Likely not, thanks to the "curse of knowledge." But there's an easy way (fun, too) to see yourself anew. Read on.
8.11: The dirty truth about cases
Bitter truth? Maybe a quarter of the cases I'm hired to write never reach the finish line. Interesting tale, that.
8.12: Why won't paper die?
Everyone's drumming their fingers, waiting for paper to expire as a communications medium. Sorry.
8.13: Can direct mail be a cash cow for smaller nonprofits? Think "cash calves" instead.
Mass-market expectations yield disappointing results at local levels. Take heart, though: direct mail is about far more than instant cash.
8.14: "Hi. My name's Inertia. And I'll be disappointing you from this day forward. I know you have many obstacles to surmount, so I'm thrilled that you've named me Number One."
Meet the enemy: Inertia
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
3.01: Analytical types: Good to the last objection
Part one of four personality types...
3.02: Amiables: Smile and say "Howdy!"
Part two of four personality types...
3.03: Expressives crave the new
Part three of four personality types...
3.04: Bottom-Liners leap to conclusions (and that's a good thing)
Part four of four personality types...
3.05: Are you interesting (especially to donors)?
Communications basics...
3.06: The Abraham Lincoln lesson
Case basics...
3.07: A surefire story formula
Case basics...
11.03: The 5 Realizations Approach
Finding the Path to Donor Nirvana
This one's going to be a longer-than-usual read. Settle in. Or print it out.

Welcome to the world premiere of my Five Realizations approach to writing your charity's case for support, a case that will effectively sell donors on your...

> projects
> programs
> endowments
> initiatives
> buildings
> renovations
> and shockingly bright ideas.

I developed this Five Realizations approach recently for a research university. The new president, convinced that academic reputation is directly linked to philanthropy, wants to turn her institution into a fundraising powerhouse.

The Five Realizations approach offers nervous deans and professors an easy, reliable set of guidelines that can help inspire concise, clear, and deeply persuasive proposals to put in front of major-gift prospects.

You're not a research university? Does not matter. Any charity can profitably follow the Path to Donor Nirvana. An annual appeal from a local library is the same as a $100 million capital campaign in one respect: both need an underlying, donor-centered case for support, in order to produce good results.

---
Your first realization: The case for support is NOT about your organization's need for cash.

The case IS about the savory, enticing opportunity you put in front of the donor.

What kinds of opportunity? To change a life (scholarships for poor kids). To save a life (medicines in south Sudan). To relieve pain (grief counseling for widows). To bring hope (research that promises to find a cure). To right a wrong (legal aid). To bring something wonderful into the world (the arts). To fight a good fight (why did millions of ordinary Americans contribute $100 apiece to the 2008 Obama presidential campaign? According to Yale professor, Dean Karlan, it was about "participating in a fight" those Americans felt was worth winning).

And those are just the "objective" opportunities. The "subjective," emotional opportunities are even more compelling. Number one among them? The opportunity to feel good about yourself.

---
Your second realization: Every donor communication sends a message. Unfortunately, more often than not, it's the WRONG message.

This is particularly true of "retention" material, which is all the stuff you send after you've acquired a new donor: thank you's, welcome packages, renewal appeals, upgrade appeals, bequest appeals, newsletters, annual reports, special updates from the field, and other forms of stewardship.

Currently, the predominant voice (I've analyzed thousands of samples by now) goes like this: "We did this great thing. We did that great thing. And oh, by the way, if you sent a check, thank you very much!"

This is backwards. It hogs the credit. Effective donor communications push as much of the credit as reasonable at the donor, with deep appreciation. It isn't merely a matter of saying thank you. You also have to say, "With your help, all these amazing things happened. And without your help, they won't." And you have to say it every chance you can, at every point of potential contact with donors and prospects, including your mission statement.

Last October, I did a quick survey of the mission statements posted by some of the world's larger charities on their websites. Only one of those mission statements even mentioned donors. That's a mistake. Donors need to be in the picture ... everywhere.

Small and young charities sometimes "get" this aspect of the Way to Donor Nirvana faster than large institutions; where even a bad day is a good day, relatively speaking. A huge volume of gifts can become a narcotic. If you're an old-guard charity making millions by swinging at low-hanging fruit decade after decade, why improve? It takes visionaries, not functionaries.

---
Your third realization: You're selling impact -- i.e., the impact of the donor's gifts. And for this realization, I want to publicly and humbly thank For Impact | The Suddes Group.

You are selling the impact on where the donor lives: her world, her region, her community, her street, her neighbors, her roots, the views she see every day out the car windows, the views she see every day on the news.

You're selling the impact on what the donor loves: her family, herself, all children (we are biologically wired to protect the young, anyone's young), and her many "tribes," which are the groups she identifies with (her faith, her school, her values and beliefs).

---
Your fourth realization: You suffer from an affliction called "the curse of knowledge," identified by Chip and Dan Heath in their bestseller, Made to Stick. The curse of knowledge ruins your best efforts at persuasion.

Dear fundraiser, this is a given: you have lost the essential ability to see your organization the way outsiders see it. This transformation happens within days of being hired. And there are no exceptions. One of the earliest symptoms? Your house jargon becomes invisible to you.

Consider this piece of web journalism, intended for the general public:

In another study Estefan is conducting, young gay men and women will be working together to create resources to teach health and social care practitioners about what is important to them when they present for care and support.

I've highlighted in red the jargon that slipped through. Here's how the passage really reads to the non-specialist mind:

In another study Estefan is conducting, young gay men and women will be working together to create something, I'm not really sure what to teach somebody, but again I don't know exactly about what is important to them when they yeah, I guess I can more or less figure out what they mean by this, and isn't that a grammatical error?.

As a communicator, you're trying to set a donor's hair on fire ... and jargon is a flame retardant.

---
Your fifth (and final) realization: You need to make it shorter. All of it. The English language has added 500,000 new words since 1950. A Westerner now sees more images in a day than a Victorian man saw in his entire lifetime. In 1990, the Internet didn't exist for the ordinary person. In 2010, the average US adult spends 13 hours a week with the Internet.

We are over-communicated to. We are distracted.

You don't have to write a lot to make a compelling point. A few years ago, I helped a campaign raise $50 million in funding on a core message that was just 25 well-chosen words long.

Stay visionary. Stay focused. Stay simple.

Consider this for your next tattoo: "Fewer words. Better pictures."
 
Copyright © 2005-2013, by Tom Ahern and Ahern Donor Communications, Ink.
All rights reserved., 10 Johnson Road, Foster, RI 02825, Phone: 401-397-8104, Email: a2bmail@aol.com.